COMPARE:
Castmagic or Capsho for podcast show notes
Castmagic and Capsho both do turning an episode into the written and clipped assets around it, and this page puts them on the same seven questions. Mamba Labs builds Apify actors, and neither of these is one of them, so there is no third column on this page.
The verdict
Castmagic is the broader workspace: transcript, custom prompts, clips and a library that grows with the show. Capsho is the quicker pack of marketing copy with a service tier if you want a person to do it. Regular publishers want Castmagic. Occasional ones want Capsho.
The same questions, both tools
| Castmagic | Capsho | |
|---|---|---|
| What it actually does | Takes an audio or video file and writes the transcript, summary, titles, show notes, social posts and blog draft from it. | Writes titles, descriptions, show notes, emails, social posts and a blog draft from an episode, with a template per format. |
| Coverage and hit rate | Transcription, speaker labels, a library of output templates, custom prompts, and clip selection for short video. | The written outputs, plus an AI clip tool and a service tier where its team does the work for you. |
| What it costs | Per plan by audio hours per month, with seats and extra hours as the things that move it. | Per plan by episodes per month, with the human service priced separately. |
| How it fits a workflow | Upload or connect the feed, pick the outputs, edit in the browser. It sits between the recording and the publishing tools. | Upload an episode and download a pack of copy. It is a step, not a workspace, and it does not hold the library. |
| Where the data comes from | Your own recordings. The prose is generated from the transcript, so what you said is the ceiling on what it writes. | Your own episode audio and the questions it asks you at upload. |
| What it takes to set up | Ten minutes. Connecting a podcast feed makes every new episode process on its own. | Minutes. The onboarding questionnaire is the only configuration. |
| Where it stops | It writes drafts. Somebody still has to read them, and the clips it picks are suggestions rather than an edit. | Podcast marketing copy is the whole product. Anything past show notes and posts is outside it. |
The same seven questions are asked on every compare page here, in this order, so two of these pages can be read against each other.
Who wins what
- Castmagic wins on coverage and hit rate, how it fits a workflow, where the data comes from. Turns a recording into show notes, clips, posts and articles in one pass.
- Capsho wins on what it costs, what it takes to set up. An AI writer for podcasters that turns an episode into marketing copy, with a done for you tier.
- Nobody wins on what it actually does, where it stops. Castmagic and Capsho give the same answer on those, and we are not going to invent a difference.
Both products
The honest answer
A show that publishes weekly and repurposes everything should take Castmagic. The feed connection and the custom prompts turn it into a pipeline rather than a chore. A show that just wants decent show notes and a few posts per episode gets that from Capsho for less. Its done for you tier is the honest option for somebody with no time at all. Both write drafts a person has to read. The transcript quality is the ceiling on both, so a badly recorded episode produces bad copy in either tool.
Some of the links on this page are affiliate links.